|
Episode # 06 - Unmasking the swindle - Emails # 27 - 31
Finally, March 2nd, 2005, Mr. Vincent Luo, sends an answer
of astonishing, surprising and lamentable content to Mr. Etchegaray.
Their content, instead of to be kind and to apologize for the delay in
responding, thanking the Preliminary Business Plan, and also giving some opinion
on the future of the relationships among the companies, it is absolutely rash,
insolent, outside of the reality and to be worse, it not even makes any direct
reference to the work that was sent to Mr. Luo, concluding with a threat about
the future of the relationships between the companies if Mr. Etchegaray
continued asking for the destination of the work that so many times were
required by Mr. Luo.
This email, a great blow was constituted for Mr. Etchegaray, because it put in
evidence that he and ECA were object of a swindle on the part of AIPTEK to
obtain information without making the investment of U$S 60.000 (sixty thousand
dollars U.S.A.) that was necessary as minimum to develop the Plan of proposed
business.
Once convinced that had been swindled, Mr. Etchegaray sends 4 more emails to Mr.
Vincent Luo, where he claims him for their unfair business practice, he demands
corporate answers and he also claims the collection of the professional
honoraria for their work, since it has been object of a swindle.
Mr. Vincent Luo, in representation of AIPTEK none of these emails never
responds.
|
|
27
Up |
Date : |
March
2nd, 2005 - H1747 |
37Kb |
Click to read
the content deeply |
|
From : |
Vincentluo@ms94.url.com.tw |
|
To : |
etchegaray@adinet.com.uy |
|
Subject
: |
Reply050302 |
|
Content
:
|
Finally, Vincent Luo and your amazing
answer:
QUOTE: “I
am not happy with your comment. I think it affect our future
relationship a lot. Remember it’s just one month so far and you reply to
my request also very very late last year.
Remember? You said you spent your time on
another project and reply to me almost 3 months after my reply to you?
I need to tell you seriously that it’s you
who lose the timing but not me.
Now I have some more options to do the
evaluation so of course, it will take me more time to reply to you about
your proposal.
Further, it’s the server that filters again
your e-mail this time.
I am just informed by my colleagues
yesterday. So pls also send to my another e-mail address next time for
avoiding this
Vincentluo2002@yahoo.com.tw.
Please be patient and don’t send to others in
AIPTEK anymore. Your interruption had affected others’ job severely in
AIPTEK.
I can tell you that will only ruin the relationship btw EAC and AIPTEK
without any benefits. I am sorry but would like
to say this is the last warning to you. Hope you understand this well
and keep your last chance.” UNQUOTE
|
|
Comments : |
After the answer lack at my three (3)
previous emails, I refuse to think that this is an act of discourtesy,
but rather some serious communication problem should exist. I insist
again. One week after this email, I receive an amazing answer signed by
Vincent Luo. |
|
H o m e
