:: Aiptek : Chronology of a fraud : Changing unilaterally the nonfulfillment agreement rules ::

best at 800 x 600 pixels

	AIPTEK: An unfair business practice history

Download documents case

F a c t s s u m m a r y

Step 01 - A p p r o a c h # 1 - 6

Step 02 - B a i t # 7 - 10

Step 03 - I n s i s t e n c e # 11 - 17

Step 04 - D e c e i v e d # 18 - 23

Step 05 - S u s p e c t i n g # 24 - 26

Step 06 - U n m a s k i n g # 27 - 31

Step 07 - First accusation # 32 - 35

Step 08 - Second abuse # 36 - 41

Step 09 - Second accusation # 42 - 44

Step 10 - Improving the offer # 45

Step 11 - First agreement # 46 - 48

Step 12 - Nonfulfillment # 49 - 52

Step 13 - Changing rules # 53

Step 14 - Attorneys' Words 1 # 54

Step 15 - Updating Birdcall 2 # 55 - 58

Step 16 - A new lie # 59

Step 17 - Attorneys' Words 2 # 60 - 62

Step 18 - The Liar's threat # 63

Step 19 - Attorneys' Words 3 # 64 - 65

Step 20 - Updating Birdcall 3 # 66

e - M a i l
etchegaray@adinet.com.uy

best if you see at
800 x 600 pixels
of resolution

texto oculto

Episode # 13 - Changing rules. Seeking to change the rules of the unfulfilled agreement unilaterally - Email # 53

Once again, under pressure, already out the terms agreed by Mr. Etchegaray, and with the unfulfilled agreement, the day Monday May 16th, Mr. Ben Lee seeks to recapture the negotiation for the U$S 3.000 (three thousand dollars U.S.A.) that didn't pay, demanding now, previous to the payment that unfulfull, a written authorization from Mr. Etchegaray to be able to use inside AIPTEK freely the document "Preliminary Business Plan" that was sent past December 23rd, 2004.

Until that moment, AIPTEK had NEVER NEVER required that authorization. However, the fact of requesting it now explicitly, is a new evidence of the strategic importance of this work carried out by ECA for AIPTEK, of the necessity that AIPTEK has of applying it freely, and a new demonstration of the commercial inappropriate behavior of AIPTEK that not having completed the agreement previously for herself outlined, also demands right to ECA without economic compensation, changing the rules of the agreement unilaterally, using as extortionate method the Non payment of the amount arranged.

53 Up	Date :	May 16th, 2005 - H0755	269Kb	Click to read the content deeply
	From :	BenLee@aiptek.com.tw
	To :	etchegaray@adinet.com.uy
	Subject :	RE: Claim U$S 3500 April 13rd, 2005 to Peter Chen - SECOND REITERATION - LAST EMAIL TO BEN LEE
	Content :	QUOTE: Dear Mr. Etchegaray, Many thanks for the message. It seems that now you focus your attention fully on getting the transfer and forget the need of making yourself committed to offer your intention of settling this mail in a written form. a. Please send us a formal letter that the right of what you have written to Vincent, with an attachment of the original document, belongs to AIPTEK International Inc. and we have the full right of circulation or using the document in any way. b. Your clear intention of giving up the right to pursue any compensation in the future on such matter. Lastly, I would like to know where and how I promise the date of transfer the fund to be Monday. When you fulfill a. and b. I would be happy to wire the fund. Best regards, Ben Lee UNQUOTE.
	Comments :	Once again, after allowing to expire the terms and when the agreement has already lost validity, Mr. Ben Lee answers the multiple emails that it had ignored until then. Now that the agreement is unfulfilled, and that him same it has lost the credibility and trust of Mr. Etchegaray, seeks to impose new conditions, showing a dilatory one again in the whole negotiation.

You are the visitor	Copyright ®2005 - ECA - Etchegaray Consultants & Associates - A/P Pedro J. Etchegaray Avallone Office Address: Santiago de Chile 1286 - P.O.Box 10908 - Montevideo - Uruguay - South America Phone: +598(2)9006010 - Telefax: +598(2)9032985 - E-mail: etchegaray@adinet.com.uy Updated: 12/10/2005	best at 800 x 600 pixels