best at 800 x 600 pixels

Etchegaray Consultants & Associates superior text

Etchegaray Consultants & Associates down text

AIPTEK: An unfair business practice history

  H o m e    C h r o n o l o g y    About Aiptek Taiwan    About ECA Uruguay    Download documents case
  F a c t s   s u m m a r y
  Step 01 - A p p r o a c h  # 1 - 6
  Step 02 - B a i t  # 7 - 10
  Step 03 - I n s i s t e n c e # 11 - 17
  Step 04 - D e c e i v e d # 18 - 23
  Step 05 - S u s p e c t i n g # 24 - 26
  Step 06 - U n m a s k i n g # 27 - 31 
  Step 07 - First accusation # 32 - 35 
  Step 08 - Second abuse # 36 - 41 
  Step 09 - Second accusation # 42 - 44 
  Step 10 - Improving the offer  # 45 
  Step 11 - First agreement # 46 - 48 
  Step 12 - Nonfulfillment  # 49 - 52 
  Step 13 - Changing rules # 53 
  Step 14 - Attorneys' Words 1 # 54 
  Step 15 - Updating Birdcall 2 # 55 - 58 
  Step 16 - A new lie  # 59 
  Step 17 - Attorneys' Words 2 # 60 - 62 
  Step 18 - The Liar's threat # 63 
  Step 19 - Attorneys' Words 3 # 64 - 65 
  Step 20 - Updating Birdcall 3 # 66 
 
 
 
    e - M a i l   
     etchegaray@adinet.com.uy
 
 

best if you see at
800 x 600 pixels
of resolution

texto oculto

Episode # 19 - Attorneys' Words. Third Round - Emails # 64 - 65

Finally, at June 21st, 2005 an answer from the Lawyers of AIPTEK appears, where they simply inform that to its view, AIPTEK doesn't have any obligation with ECA because neither there has been written contract.
This answer is absolutely outside of context, it demonstrates total ignorance of the documentation exchanged among the companies, including the reiterated recognition on the part of AIPTEK of the debt, and it seems a dissuasive measure  more than anything that to a measure with the minimun juridical base.

Nevertheless, and for respect to the colleagues, this email without legal sustenance, it is answered immediately by the attorneys at law from ECA, where they are made several legal explanations, the reclamation of the immediate payment of the U$S 10350 is reiterated, and it is also recommended that that payment becomes effective before the figure is continued already increasing for the execution of the map road that AIPTEK knows already

Lastly, they are also communicated that Mr. Etchegaray has suffered a serious surgical intervention from which is recovering, and until he come back, they cannot continue ahead the actions hat they have announced already, suggesting to AIPTEK take advantage of that time to pay.
 


64

Up

 Date :

June 21st, 2005 - H0717


42Kb
 

Click to read the content deeply

 From :

shao-shu.hung@mail.pwcglobal.com.tw

 To :

AttorneysAtLaw@adinet.com.uy

Cc :

CharlinChen@aiptek.com.tw; Justin.Wang@mail.pwcglobal.com.tw; Edward.Lin@mail.pwcglobal.com.tw; etchegaray@adinet.com.uy
 

 Subject :

Claim of US$10,350 by Etchegaray Associate Consultants("EAC") against Aiptek

Content :

QUOTE:

Dear Mr. Pedro J. Etchegaray,

We, Puhua & Associates, act on behalf of AIPTEK for the captioned matter.
Regarding the EAC's claim of US$10,350 against Aiptek, please refer to our letter dated June 21, 2005 as attached, which is self-explanatory. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us.

Best regards,

Shao-shu HUNG
PuHua & Associates 普華商務法律事務所
17F-3, No.295, Sec. 2, Kuang-Fu Rd., Hsin-Chu 300, Taiwan
新竹市300光復路二段295號17樓之3(帝國大樓)(新竹所)
TEL: 886-3-5752323
FAX: 886-3-5727978
_________________________

UNQUOTE. 

Attachments:

20050621 - Attachment received from Shao-Shung-hung - AIPTEK-EAC - 061405F.pdf


114Kb

 Comments :

This is the first communication on behalf of the lawyers of AIPTEK regarding this problem. Their simplicity and poor argument can only be justified by the lack of knowledge about the facts (they evidently never read the records).

Finally, it is surprising that an international Consultant of the category of Price Waterhouse Coopers, will be supported legally over lawyers that emits this type of statements.
 


65

Up

 Date :

June 21st, 2005 - H1450


75Kb
 

Click to read the content deeply

 From :

AttorneysAtLaw@adinet.com.uy

 To :

shao-shu.hung@mail.pwcglobal.com.tw

Cc :

CharlinChen@aiptek.com.tw; Justin.Wang@mail.pwcglobal.com.tw; Edward.Lin@mail.pwcglobal.com.tw;
PeterChen@aiptek.com.tw; TedTung@aiptek.com.tw;
JackyChen@aiptek.com.tw; BenLee@apitek.com.tw;
etchegaray@adinet.com.uy; bordabehere@adinet.com.uy

 Subject :

RE: Claim of US$10,350 by Etchegaray Associate Consultants("EAC") against Aiptek

Content :

 

Attachments:

Attorney at Law Report about trial against AIPTEK.pdf


77Kb

 Comments :

The lawyers of ECA, respond the same day to the lawyers of Aiptek, expressing them that lowly, their point of view is erroneous and they have not captured the graveness of the matter neither the background of the problem.

Finally, it is notified to them that their defended, Mr. Etchegaray, it has just been submitted to a surgery that will take it away from the company for a period of time, and then it will be expected to their return to solve this matter.
 


You are the visitor 

Copyright ®2005 - ECA - Etchegaray Consultants & Associates - A/P Pedro J. Etchegaray Avallone 
Office Address: Santiago de Chile 1286 - P.O.Box 10908 - Montevideo - Uruguay - South America
Phone: +598(2)9006010 - Telefax: +598(2)9032985 - E-mail: etchegaray@adinet.com.uy
Updated: 13/10/2005

 
best at 800 x 600 pixels

Contador de visitas a la página